The Inhuman Condition: Rethinking Anthropocentrism

Authors

  • Jonatan Palmblad Rachel Carson Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc-springs-19654

Abstract

For almost half a decade, the idea that anthropocentrism is driving the ecological crisis has gained credence among academics and nature advocates, but this assumption must be reconsidered. Not only is it wrong to say that humanity’s care for itself causes environmental destruction, but it is also wrong to say that such a care is part of a general human ethos. Instead of embracing anthropocentrism as commonly conceived, this article rethinks this muddy notion by emphasizing that a genuine care for ourselves, one another, and our species implies a care for the ecological world of which we are a part.

Author Biography

  • Jonatan Palmblad, Rachel Carson Center

    Jonatan Palmblad is an environmental humanist, who defended his PhD at the Rachel Carson Center, LMU Munich, in 2023. Understanding the environmental humanities as a generalist field, he unites fields like philosophy, psychology, cognition, literature, human ecology, and the respective histories of environment, technology, and ideas to make sense of human–environment interaction. At the time of writing, he is a project coordinator at the Rachel Carson Center, an associate editor for Environmental Humanities, and a board member of ICEHO.

     

© picture alliance / ASSOCIATED PRESS | Mohammad Abu Samra. All rights reserved.

Downloads

Published

17-02-2026

Issue

Section

Articles